Crisis of the West

Rethinking the West: Security, Economy, and Geopolitical Realignment
In a world marked by rising instability, the Western alliance is undergoing a profound transformation. From the erosion of Cold War-era nuclear deterrence to ideological shifts in economic policy, both Europe and the United States are navigating a complex new global order.
For decades, the U.S. ensured European and Asian security through an extended nuclear deterrent. Today, that strategy is faltering. Russia’s aggressive posturing, China’s military expansion, Iran’s ambitions, and disruptive technologies are all contributing to renewed nuclear insecurity. President Trump’s scepticism toward NATO has revived old fears about U.S. disengagement, forcing Europe to consider autonomous security strategies—developed in cooperation with researchers, policymakers, and civil society.
As Christoph Heusgen notes, the classical Cold War "West" is dissolving. The U.S. is stepping back from its leadership role, while Europe remains anchored to democratic principles and the rule of law. This realignment is paving the way for new alliances—such as an "Alliance of Multilateralism"—with like-minded nations like Canada and Australia.
U.S. conservative thought is also shifting. Oren Cass, founder of American Compass, argues for an economic policy centered on the working citizen — supporting tariffs, re-industrialization, vocational training, and labor unions. His ideas depart from GOP free-market orthodoxy and resemble European social democracy more than Reaganomics.
A fresh analysis of the Trump presidency, grounded in the Elite Quality Index (EQx2025), suggests that institutional change is increasingly driven by intra-elite competition among tech, finance, energy, and education sectors. These elite shifts raise a critical question: are we creating sustainable value, or merely extracting it?
The European Union is also rethinking its role. Facing war in Ukraine, technological dependency, and internal weaknesses, the EU's "Competitiveness Compass" aims to boost investment, reduce bureaucracy, and strengthen supply chains. Yet this strategy risks clashing with traditional EU values such as sustainability, human rights, and free trade.
Finally, Trump’s tariff-focused trade policy has drawn criticism. Economist Martin Wolf argues that tariffs may reduce the trade deficit but harm productivity and investment. A smarter strategy? Channel cheap capital into high-value, tradable sectors—benefiting both the U.S. and the global economy.
As the geopolitical and economic landscape continues to shift, the West must reinvent itself—strategically, institutionally, and ideologically.

Book

Towards an Elite Theory of Economic Development: An Inquiry into Sustainable Value Creation (available in September 2025)

As we described our work on the publisher’s website: Institutions, the humanly devised constraints of economic activity, are outcomes of elite agency. Leveraging ideas from economics, sociology, politics, and strategic management, this book proposes an “elite theory of economic development”. The overarching goal is to foster sustainable value creation at the elite business model level. This work also aims to contribute to transformational leadership, and links are made to the annual Elite Quality Index (EQx), a measure of the value creation of national elites.

Book

Why Nations Fail: The Origins of Power, Prosperity, and Poverty

To better grasp the broader aims of elite theory, it is worth taking a look at the now-classic work by Noble Prize winners. Daron Acemoglu and James Robinson link inclusive institutions to prosperity.

Book

The Fragile Balance of Terror. Deterrence in the New Nuclear Age

"The Fragile Balance of Terror", edited by Vipin Narang and Scott D. Sagan, brings together a diverse collection of rigorous and creative scholars who analyze how the nuclear landscape is changing for the worse.

Podcast

The Economics Show

Unfortunately, not me but Martin Wolf, the Chief Economics Commentator at the Financial Times, talks to Kenneth Rogoff about Donald Trump's trade policy, the future of the dollar, and what this means for other currencies.

Book

The Future of European Competitiveness

Europe is another focus of elite theory which examines the performance of its elite system. There is no stronger diagnosis of the continents’ challenges than Mario Draghi’s report, "The Future of European Competitiveness" (2024) that benchmarks Europe against China and the United States.

Book

Nuclear War: A Scenario

Up to now, no one outside of official circles has known exactly what would happen if a rogue state launched a nuclear missile at the Pentagon. Second by second and minute by minute, these are the real-life protocols that choreograph the end of civilisation as we know it. Based on dozens of new interviews with military and civilian experts, "Nuclear War" by Annie Jacobsen is at once a compulsive non-fiction thriller and a powerful argument that we must rid ourselves of these world-ending weapons for ever.

Book

Our Dollar, Your Problem

Harvard Professor Kenneth Rogoff demonstrates that the dollar’s decline began before Trump.

Book

If Then: How the Simulmatics Corporation Invented the Future.

This is a fascinating book that sheds light on early attempts to predict the future using data-driven forecasts and models – long before big data and social media dominated our lives. Jill Lepore takes us on a journey through the history of the Simulmatics Corporation, which in the 1960s attempted to control society through data analysis – first from 5th Avenue in New York for commercial marketing, then in the 1960 election campaign for John F. Kennedy, and at one point even in the Vietnam War. Their story impressively shows how technological developments and early forms of data analysis influenced the political landscape and continue to change our understanding of democracy and power to this day. But it also shows where the limits of the technologisation of democracy lie.

Podcast

Future of AI, Simulating Reality, Physics and Video Games

Demis Hassabis, CEO of Google DeepMind and Nobel Prize laureate, in conversation with Lex Fridman. One central focus of contemporary elite theory is artificial intelligence (AI), as emerging elites redefine the political economy. To understand the nature of the technology ahead, give it a listen.

Series

Yellowstone

"We're steeped in liberal culture" – many conservatives claim that we are saturated with left-wing liberal culture. They say that everything, from films and television to music, is ‘woke’ and ‘out of touch’. However, some productions are particularly successful in reaching conservative audiences. The neo-Western series "Yellowstone", starring Kevin Costner, tells stories about family ties, loyalty, resistance to the state, the conflict between the urban coastal mentality and that of the north-west, and the connection to the land itself.

Podcast

Interesting Times

There are more conservative podcasts than there is time to listen to them all. But Ross Douthat's “Interesting Times” is worth the 45 minutes a week. His guests are mostly conservatives, some very well-known such as Peter Thiel and Vice President JD Vance, others increasingly well- known such as Oren Cass, or (for many of us) yet to be discovered such as publisher Jonathan Keeperman.

Book

Why Liberalism Failed

In 2018, Deneen published what I still consider to be the sharpest conservative diagnosis of our times. In my view, it is essential reading. Oren Cass often sounds like an echo of Deneen.

Stay focused

From the feeds of universities, think tanks, and the media.
Yesterday
20.08.2025
19.08.2025
Trump’s Ukraine summit was a European damage control operation. It succeeded – for now
Politics

Trump’s Ukraine summit was a European damage control operation. It succeeded – for now

Trump’s Ukraine summit was a European damage control operation. It succeeded – for now Expert comment jon.wallace 19 August 2025 More positive indications on US security guarantees are welcome. But the US president still believes in personal diplomacy with a Russian leader who has yet to even hint of concessions. President Donald Trump hosted President Zelenskyy for the second time in the Oval Office in Washington on Monday. This time the tone, setting and line-up differed dramatically from the public humiliation Zelenskyy suffered in February. The presence of leaders from the UK, Germany, France and Italy was a notable display of European solidarity with Ukraine, intended to prevent another calamitous outcome and preserve Transatlantic unity. It was also important to ensure that President Trump did not force Ukraine into making unnecessary concessions, following Friday’s inconclusive summit with Russian President Vladimir Putin. Related content Independent Thinking: Will Trump deliver for Ukraine? After that meeting in Alaska, overwhelmingly described in US and global media as a victory for Putin, Trump needed a diplomatic win. It was clear that nearly nothing had been agreed in Anchorage, with Trump forced to admit afterwards there are ‘a couple of big ones’ (points) that remain unresolved. There was no disclosure of what these points might be, but it is safe to assume they include the status of Ukrainian territories, the role of the US and other NATO member states in guaranteeing Ukraine’s security post-war – and the possibility of a bilateral meeting between Putin and Zelenskyy. One of the only significant outcomes of the Alaska summit was a gain for Russia: Trump’s backtracking on the need for an unconditional ceasefire before launching a genuine, high-level diplomatic track towards a final peace deal.Putin’s motivesEuropeans know that Putin is pushing a comprehensive peace agreement in order to draw out negotiations with demands to address the ‘root causes’ of the conflict, while continuing the war against Ukraine. In Putin-speak, addressing ‘root causes’ means restricting NATO’s presence in Eastern Europe, and allowing Russia to define the limits of Ukraine’s sovereignty.  European leaders know that this is a no-go. That is why both German Chancellor Friedrich Merz and French President Emmanuel Macron urged President Trump to put pressure on Putin to establish a ceasefire ahead of the next meeting. But this appeal seems to be falling on deaf ears.   Putin has spent years describing Ukraine’s president as an illegitimate leader of a country that should not exist…agreeing to meet therefore risks being perceived as weakness on his part. Trump is pushing for a bilateral meeting between Putin and Zelenskyy at least in part in the hope of securing a Nobel Peace Prize nomination. Zelenskyy has stated his readiness to meet, to please the US president – even though he knows that such a meeting could be used by Putin to accuse Ukraine of obstructing Trump’s wishes. Putin’s goal throughout all negotiations is to have the US abandon Kyiv and deliver a reset with Moscow.Russia is also uncertain about the benefits of a presidential summit: the Kremlin has not yet publicly confirmed readiness to meet Zelenskyy. Putin has spent years describing Ukraine’s president as an illegitimate leader of a country that should not exist in the first place. Agreeing to meet therefore risks being perceived as weakness on his part, particularly to his ultra-patriotic constituencies and military and security elites.And the Russian leadership demonstrates no willingness to back down on its demands, knowing in advance (after two rounds of talks in Turkey) that they are unacceptable for Ukraine. Russian Foreign Minister Sergey Lavrov again stated that there could be no lasting peace agreement without taking into account ‘Russian security interests’, the rights of Russian speakers in Ukraine and that the peace settlement should not be a pretext to prepare Ukraine for war.What Kyiv needsOne positive piece of news from the Washington summit is the US signalling its readiness to participate in providing Ukraine’s security. Details are scarce, but President Trump has floated the idea of the US participating in the air. US involvement could be a game-changer for the aim of the  ‘coalition of the willing’ to provide a reassurance force inside Kyiv-controlled territories, as guarantors of any ceasefire line or peace deal. Related content Mobilizing ‘Team Ukraine’ for a successful recovery Reports indicate that US State Secretary Marco Rubio will lead a working group to design collective security guarantees for Ukraine – though outside of NATO. Measures to be discussed include an international military presence inside Ukraine, boosted air defences, reconstitution of the Ukrainian army, and how to monitor a ceasefire. The details should be developed in as little as 10 days. However, the chances of this track collapsing are high, especially if the Russians signal their discontent directly to Trump.Kyiv has already signed over 30 bilateral security agreements, including a 10-year agreement with the US. These essentially provide access to funding and military cooperation arrangements.What Ukraine needs now is a mechanism that provides defence in case Russia decides to mount another attack following the end of hostilities. Since Russia is a nuclear state, Ukraine’s security protection must include other nuclear powers.

Chatham House

Donald Trump's Attacks on the Fed Could Signal a MAGA Takeover
Business

Donald Trump's Attacks on the Fed Could Signal a MAGA Takeover

Donald Trump's continued attacks on Federal Reserve chief Jerome Powell threaten the pillars of the U.S. economy. He could be planning a complete MAGA takeover of monetary policy.

Der Spiegel

18.08.2025
17.08.2025