Students from the MIT Cybersecurity Clinic help local governments and other vulnerable organizations defend against digital threats.
MIT
“SceneSmith” system uses collaborative AI agents to create realistic 3D environments of places like kitchens, hotels, and living rooms, where robots can simulate everyday chores.
MIT
Climate diplomacy has gone freelance. Multilateralism must adapt, not disappear Expert comment thilton.drupal 13 July 2026 The recent London Climate Action Week revealed that while formal climate multilateralism remains under strain, climate diplomacy is becoming more diffused, implementation oriented and focused on delivering security. As much of Europe emerged from a record-breaking heatwave that closed schools, disrupted businesses and exposed the limits of adaptation even in some of the world’s wealthiest economies, London Climate Action Week (LCAW) took on particular salience. While the impacts of climate change were unfolding in real time, more than 75,000 participants from across the world attended over 1,300 events to debate the future of global climate action.The central takeaway was not simply renewed urgency. It was that climate diplomacy is changing shape and that climate action is happening. In recent years, many have questioned the effectiveness of the United Nations Framework Convention on Climate Change (UNFCCC). The slow pace of consensus-based negotiations and the limited progress made at its annual COP summits have led some to argue that climate multilateralism is dead, or at least on life support. Governments must adapt to a world in which climate leadership is defined by implementing practical solutions through coalitions. LCAW is not itself a formal multilateral forum, but it did offer an important window into how climate diplomacy more broadly is evolving. It highlighted that alongside multilateral negotiations, complementary forms of international climate cooperation that focus on implementation and coalition-building are growing in importance. Climate leadership is becoming less about grand declarations and more about sustained credibility and action. As geopolitical tensions reshape energy markets, trade, security priorities and development pathways, much of the practical work is increasingly taking place outside traditional multilateral channels. Governments remain essential actors, but they now operate within a much broader ecosystem of cities, businesses, financial institutions, philanthropists and civil society. LCAW pointed to how climate diplomacy is becoming more diffuse – and arguably more suited to the current fragmented geopolitical era. Three shifts stood out.Climate security looms largeFirst, climate security has become an increasingly central part of the climate conversation. The recent Strait of Hormuz crisis is a stark reminder that today, geopolitical instability, energy security and the transition away from fossil fuels are increasingly intertwined, reinforcing the need to strengthen resilience while accelerating climate action. Increasingly, climate change and biodiversity loss are recognised as interconnected security challenges, as reflected for example in the UK government’s recent national security assessment on global ecosystems. As a result, climate is no longer being treated as a standalone environmental issue but as part of a broader nexus of environmental change driving risks across security, economic resilience and public health. The UK’s new Climate Security Taskforce, launched during LCAW, is a case in point. The taskforce brings together leading experts to advise the government on how to tackle growing climate threats. Related work It isn’t easy being green: The UK’s net zero trilemma The taskforce helps cement the UK’s leading role in shaping climate security thinking. The UK first recognized climate change as a core national security challenge in its 2008 National Security Strategy. More recently, the National Security Strategy 2025, Strategic Defence Review 2025 and the launch of the taskforce demonstrate how this framing has become increasingly embedded in the UK’s national security planning.Other governments are also increasingly explicitly treating climate change as a national security issue. Germany’s 2023 National Security Strategy recognizes that ‘our international and security environment … is increasingly defined by the existential threat posed by the climate crisis’. France’s 2022 National Strategic Review, Australia’s 2024 National Defence Strategy and Japan’s 2022 National Security Strategy all integrate climate into assessments of national resilience, strategic risk and economic security. This trend is here to stay.Shift towards practical delivery Second, the conversation is shifting from climate commitments to their implementation, with increasing emphasis on practical measures that deliver multiple benefits beyond emissions reductions. Climate action is becoming more explicitly linked to building resilience, strengthening energy security, enhancing industrial competitiveness and supporting economic growth. Discussions on the energy transition are increasingly centred on competitiveness, industrial strategy and electrification initiatives. This reflects a growing recognition that fossil fuel dependence is itself a strategic vulnerability and that resilient, diversified energy systems are central to long-term security. At LCAW, this shift was captured by the launch of the Electrify Now initiative – a coalition of governments and non-government organizations backed by the European Commission, the UK, Turkey, Australia, Ethiopia, and others. By promoting electrification across transport, buildings and industry, the initiative frames electrification not simply as a climate objective, but as a strategy for energy security, economic competitiveness and resilience. In doing so, it translates ambitious climate goals into concrete implementable actions with clear economic and strategic benefits. At the same time, water and nature have emerged as entry points for building resilience. Water is beginning to receive the strategic attention it deserves. In many regions, water stress is already driving instability, yet shared water resources can also provide opportunities for cooperation and diplomacy. This is illustrated by transboundary river basins such as the Mekong or the Senegal, where competing national interests coexist with sustained diplomatic engagement and institutional cooperation.
Chatham House
Das US-Militär hat mehrfach Angriffe auf den Iran geflogen. Omid Nouripour (Grüne) hält eine Rückkehr an den Verhandlungstisch für schwierig. Beim Konflikt gehe es dem iranischen Regime zudem nicht nur um die Straße von Hormus.Heckmann, Dirk-Oliver
Deutschlandfunk
Die Ideale der US-Unabhängigkeitserklärung sind durch die Regierung Trump ramponiert, sagt Literaturwissenschaftler Adrian Daub. Und die Tech-Elite des Slicon Valley hat das Zukuftsversprechen des Amerikanischen Traums in eine Zukunftsdrohung verkehrt.Reinhardt, Anja
Deutschlandfunk
Kaum ein Gebrauchsobjekt spaltet die Gesellschaft so wie das Auto. Für die einen ist es ein ökologisches Problem, das Straßen verstopft und Atemluft verschmutzt - für die anderen ein notwendiges Transportmittel und Ausdruck individueller Freiheit.Maak, Niklas
Deutschlandfunk
